tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21177018.post114251258767370100..comments2023-08-05T09:36:31.185-04:00Comments on New York's 24th District Independent: Moderated Forums, Arcuri, and Abortion24thIndependenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16411599694795845193noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21177018.post-1142614622600128472006-03-17T11:57:00.000-05:002006-03-17T11:57:00.000-05:00Bob [Utican] - You're not reading carefully. Read...Bob [Utican] - <BR/><BR/>You're not reading carefully. Read the article again, slowly this time.<BR/><BR/>The article talks about a commment left by somebody on the Arcuri campaign's forum. That comment asked Arcuri about his position on abortion.<BR/><BR/>That comment was deleted.<BR/><BR/>In the article you commented on, I explained that I would be going over to the Arcuri forum and putting up another question about Arcuri's positon on the abortion issue. That's the one you see there now.<BR/><BR/>Those are two different comments. One is gone, and one is still there. Get it?<BR/><BR/>Now, I have noticed this morning, thanks to your comment that took me over to the Arcuri web site, that the Arcuri campaign has taken down the link to the discussion forum. I don't know why they've done that, today of all days. Maybe there's a good explanation, and I've written another article asking for one.<BR/><BR/>The issue of the missing link to the forum is, once again, separate from the issue of the missing comment on that forum.<BR/><BR/>I never said I was against the moderation of a discussion board by a campaign. I'm only interested in seeing if the Arcuri campaign will address the question of Arcuri's position on the legality of abortion.<BR/><BR/>I do think, however, that having a discussion board is a very good idea for a campaign web site. I'm disappointed that the Les Roberts site doesn't have one, and have pointed that out. I'm also disappointed that the Mike Arcuri web site has removed links to theirs.<BR/><BR/>Now you're coming over here and leaving really confused messages that suggest to me that you're not even bothering to read most of what I write before you think of a criticism for it.<BR/><BR/>Please calm down and think things through, before you make another foolish comment here for your Utica colleagues to read.24thIndependenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16411599694795845193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21177018.post-1142612253532605102006-03-17T11:17:00.000-05:002006-03-17T11:17:00.000-05:00You ask "Is Arcuri Pro-Choice or Pro-Life?" Please...You ask "Is Arcuri Pro-Choice or Pro-Life?" Please don't fall into the trap of using those terms as mutually exclusive.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21177018.post-1142610289377717932006-03-17T10:44:00.000-05:002006-03-17T10:44:00.000-05:00Oh, Utican. I WOULD hate spouting off about somet...Oh, Utican. <BR/><BR/>I WOULD hate spouting off about something that I'm just plain wrong about, except that, in this case, I'm <B>not</B>.<BR/><BR/>That entry you see on the Arcuri discussion board? It's the one that <B>I put there</B> right after writing this article - as I explained in the article I would do.<BR/><BR/>Think about it now. Go back and check the date and time that message was posted. It's exactly the same time and date that I posted this article: Thursday Mar 16, 2006 7:35 am<BR/><BR/>Now, it's pretty telling that, the day after I wrote my article about the moderation on the Arcuri discussion board, the link to the board was removed from the lefthand sidebar of the Arcuri for Congress campaign web site.<BR/><BR/>Never fear. For now, you can still access the forum by typing in www.arcuriforcongress/forum into your web browser.<BR/><BR/>Utican, or should I say Bob Hyde, you've represented yourself in your profile as affiliate with the Utica County Democratic Committee. I suggest that the next time you try to represent the Utica Democrats, you think a little bit longer before you speak.24thIndependenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16411599694795845193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21177018.post-1142521505560285172006-03-16T10:05:00.000-05:002006-03-16T10:05:00.000-05:00Yes and now the Kansas State Board of Education ha...Yes and now the Kansas State Board of Education has decided that parents need to opt in for sex ed for their kids.<BR/><BR/>The more they push this religious morality, the less important religion becomes to the young.<BR/><BR/>It's like trying to get a President to eat broccoli because it's good for you. Sometimes the harder you try the more stubborn and opposed they become.<BR/><BR/>The religious zealots don't understand the harder they try, the more they fail.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com